|
|
Critics of the Watchtower
Society (WTS) claim its literature misquotes and otherwise misrepresents
secular sources, in an apparent attempt to support its doctrines. Here are
some apparent misquotes that have been submitted by website visitors. They
are provided here to provide you with a direction in your personal
research—not as the final word, but to stimulate further examination.
Please verify this information for yourself by checking original source
materials.
Definitions:
Misquotes are citations of other
authors' work that is inaccurate in content or which changes the essential
meaning of the author's writings.
Misrepresentations are statements
about subject matter that are disproven by objective scientific data.
Examples of misrepresentations can be seen in the topic of blood
transfusions. The WTS repeatedly makes statements regarding supposed
medical risks of transfusions and claims transfusions are medically
unnecessary, while medical science widely disagrees.
Topic: The Fall
of Jerusalem
Significance:
Impacts the Watchtower’s calculation of Armageddon’s time frame;
calculations being off by a few years radically deflate this major WT
teaching.
-
Watchtower says: Nebuchadnezzar captured
Jerusalem
& appointed a new king in 617 B.C.E., quoting Assyrian and Babylonian
Chronicles by A. K. Grayson, as a supporting source.—Insight from
the Scriptures Source says: No date is given.
-
Watchtower says: The battle of
Carchemish took place in
625 (pg. 480 Insight Book, Vol. #2), quoting A.K. Grayson’s book as a
supporting resource. Source says: The battle took place in 605.
-
Watchtower says:
"In 624 BCE he took the vast booty to
Babylon," quoting from
the book by A.K. Grayson on pg. 100. Source says: The year was
605.
-
Watchtower says: Nebuchadnezzar’s seventh year of reign was 617 BCE,
listing ??? as a source. Source says: The cuneiform tablet shown
as the original source does not provide a date. However, the secular book
sourced says 616-609 BCE was Nabopolassar’s 10th – 17th
year, meaning 617 could not have been Nebuchadnezzar’s seventh year of
reign because he had not come into power yet.
Topic: Blood
Transfusions
Significance:
Jehovah’s Witnesses must follow the Watchtower Society’s
rules about blood transfusions in order to remain in good standing and be
eligible for the afterlife. They are thoroughly and methodically taught
that medical facts prove the religious rules against acceptance of blood and
blood products is better from a medical point of view. (Journal of
Church and State, Fall 2005)
-
Watchtower says: Joseph Priestly says early Christians were not allowed
to eat blood, as per The Theological and Miscellaneous Works of Joseph
Priestley. –How Can Blood Save Your Life? Source says:
Early Christians were allowed to eat blood.— The Theological and
Miscellaneous Works of Joseph Priestley
-
Watchtower says:
Eusebius said that
early Christians did not eat blood under any circumstances.—How Can
Blood Save Your Life?
Source says: Eusebius never made the claim that there was
absolutely no circumstance in which early Christians did not eat blood.
-
Watchtower says:
Tertullian said that early Christians did not eat blood under any
circumstances.—How Can Blood Save Your Life? Source says:
Tertullian did not make that statement. He spoke only of disdain for
drinking blood of murder victims.
-
Watchtower says:
The Journal Cancer says that blood transfusions hinder the immune
system.—How Can Blood Save Your Life? Source says: The
journal article does not claim there is a cause and effect relationship
between transfusions and immune suppression.—Cancer, 2/15/1987
-
Watchtower says:
The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, & Laryngology says that blood
transfusions increase the likelihood of cancer recurring.—How Can Blood
Save Your Life? Source says: The journal article specifically
states that the study did not prove a cause and effect relationship. —Annals
of Otology, Rhinology, & Laryngology,
March 1989
-
Watchtower says:
The
Annals of Otology, Rhinology, & Laryngology recommends that surgeons
“become bloodless surgeons”.—How Can Blood Save Your Life?
Source says: The journal article does make a statement in this
regard; however, it is clear that its meaning of “bloodless surgeon” is
different than that of the lay reader and that of the Watchtower Society.
The article goes on to recommend use of safer blood products, not
elimination of blood products altogether. The WT’s quote omits this piece
of information, resulting in an implication that the journal supports its
anti-blood teaching on medical grounds. —Annals of Otology, Rhinology,
& Laryngology,
March 1989
-
Watchtower says:
Tarter says blood
transfusions have a high risk of dangerous infections.—How Can Blood
Save Your Life? Source says: Patients in the study were ill
and more prone to complications. Patients in the study’s control group
were not patients who refused blood transfusions because of their
beliefs. The WT does not mention the positive prognosis of the patients
in the study, even those who were infected.—Blood Transfusion and
Infectious Complication Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery, Tarter
-
Watchtower says:
According to the New
York Times, contracting Lyme Disease from a blood transfusion is a
significant risk and health officials are not taking action to safeguard
the blood supply.—How Can Blood Save Your Life? Source says:
The WT brochure omits the source’s discussion of the safeguards already in
place, the medical reasons why the safeguards are considered sufficient,
the extreme unlikelihood of contracting Lyme Disease via a transfusion,
and the fact that there were no cases of transmission of Lyme Disease via
blood transfusions.— Lawrence K. Altman, MD, “Lyme Disease from a
Transfusion? It’s Unlikely, but Experts are Wary,”
New York Times,
7/18/1989
-
Watchtower says:
The New York Times says
that transmission of Chagas Disease via blood transfusions is a
significant risk.—How Can Blood Save Your Life? Source says:
Transmission of this disease via transmission is remote, there are only 2
known cases in history, and available sanitation procedures are effective.
—“Scientists Fear that a Parasite Will Spread in Transfusion,”
New York Times,
5/23/1989
-
Watchtower says: 8-17% of transfused patients in certain countries
contracted Hepatitis C from their transfusions. Source says:
The WT does not quote a source for this statistic, so it cannot be
verified. However, the per-transfusion transmission rate of Hepatitis
C was less than 1% at that time. —New York Times
2/13/1990; American Red
Cross. (There have been no known transmission of Hepatitis C in
pasteurized blood products since technology became available to safeguard
those products.) The WT failed to mention that a test for Hepatitis C was
to be available soon.
-
Watchtower says: The New York Times says testing done on the blood
supply cannot detect all strains of HIV.—How Can Blood Save Your Life?
Source says: Old medical information from 1989 is being
presented in the current guide about blood without mention that it is
outdated. The WT fails to mention that improvements in tests will soon be
available, and until then, questionable blood will be discarded. — New
York Times, 6/271989
-
Watchtower says:
According to the American
Association of Blood Banks, people with significant blood loss survive and
are healthy. —How Can Blood Save Your Life? Source says:
Significant blood loss carries with it significant risk of shock, organ
failure, heart attack, and death. It is imperative to restore blood volume
quickly.—Contemporary Transfusion Practice, published by the
American Association of Blood Banks
-
Watchtower says:
According to the American
Association of Blood Banks, nonblood volume expanders are safe and
effective in cases of extreme blood loss.—How Can Blood Save Your
Life? Source says: Nonblood volume expanders are unsafe and
ineffective in cases of extreme blood loss.; red blood cells are the most
effective method to carry essential oxygen through the body. —
Contemporary Transfusion Practice, published by the American
Association of Blood Banks
Note: There are many more misrepresentations on this topic discussed in
the Fall 2005 Journal of Church and State.
TOPIC: Sex During Menstruation
18.
Watchtower says: According to The Bible and Modern Medicine, having sex during
menstruation causes disease and cancer.—June 2006 Watchtower
Source says: The quoted source was published in 1953. Responsible
authors do not represent 53 year old medical publications as current and
accurate. Medical science has long debunked the myth that sex during
menstruation causes disease and cancer.
TOPIC: Creationism & Evolution
19.
Watchtower says: According to Carl Sagan, fossils could prove there is a Creator.--
Creation Book: Ch5 p.70 Source says: The quote in context states
fossils prove the unlikelihood of a competent Creator. (Note: Carl Sagan
does not speak highly of the WTS; in Broca’s Brain, he discussed the
false apocalyptic predictions it made and how it reinvented its past
statements when its predictions didn’t come true. He refers to this as
“shamelessly dishonest”.)
TOPIC: False Religion
20.
Watchtower says:
According to historian Paul
Johnson, some destructive sects of Christianity began in a state of
confusion.
Source says: Christianity as
a whole, apostolic Christianity, began in a state of confusion. By adding
the word “apostate” to the quote, the WTS has changed the essential meaning.
|